What celebrities would look like if they moved to Oklahoma
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
I LOVE THEM ALL SO MUCH. I think Pamela Anderson is my favorite, though. Or Ashlee Simpson.
Thanks to Jillie for sending this to me…. it made my day!
Madonna just got an UGLY EYEBROW RED CARD. Also, photoshop is officially a weapon.
GAAAAAHHHHH BURN IT!!! BURN IT WITH FIRE!
Part of me thinks both sides of this photo are photoshopped… because there’s obviously no way the left isn’t messed with… but does Madonna really look like that (the right) unphotoshopped? That’s …. terrifying. What happened to her eyebrows? And who chose that unfortunate shade? Also, why would you COMPLETELY change someone’s eye color? Weirdos. At least her awesome cheek crease is legit. GOOD FOR HER.
Model sues for NOT being photoshopped in advertisement!
HA! This is a first. Daily Mail reports that Model Caroline Louise Forsling is suing Estee Lauder for $2 million claiming she was made to appear older in an advertisment because they DIDN’T PHOTOSHOP HER. She also claims she was unaware the photo could be used, and thought it was a test shot.
She claims her career was ‘irreparably’ damaged by the ad. The product says it was tested on women between the ages of 45-60. Funny, since she’s 35. HOMEGIRL, YOU NEED TO STAY OUT OF THE SUN! You got rankles like Iggy Pop.
Apparently before her makeup was done, they asked her to do a test shot without makeup, and the model ‘believed the test shot would not be used.’ She did not use the product for a before and after shot, which is the most ironic part to me. I didn’t realize they could photoshop before and after shots. That seems misleading, no? I hope it’s disclosed at the bottom, “WE PHOTOSHOPPED THE SHIT OUT OF THIS PICTURE.”
I personally don’t buy that her career has been damaged. That would be like a fat model suing a magazine because they didn’t make her look skinny. IT’S. HER. FACE. And saying she “believed the test shot would not be used” doesn’t mean Estee Lauder told her it wouldn’t be used. It would be reasonable to assume they didn’t tell her that since she would definitely mention that in the lawsuit if it were true. So basically what I’m saying is it’s her own fault for letting the picture be taken without something in writing saying test shots wouldn’t be used.
I mean, was it even a test shot? If I was a model at a photoshoot for a skin care product and they pulled my hair back and asked to do a picture without makeup, I’d assume that wasn’t a test shot. Why would they need a test shot without makeup? Aren’t test shots just for lighting? So you’d think most test shots would take place when makeup was already on their face. MAN. I know nothing about modeling. I knew I should’ve payed more attention during my glamour shot photoshoots as a child.
What do you think? Is that ad worth $2 million in damages?
New Harry Potter photoshop wizardry makes Harry look like Rachel Dratch
The newest Harry Potter poster was photoshopped to Hogwarts and back into A CRAZY DISASTER. What’d they do to his face! He looks like a mixture between Rachel Dratch’s Debbie Downer character and a kid with a lazy eye.
Kim Kardashian has weird upper abs.
Am I the only person that notices Kim’s weird upper abs? Also, they did something super weird to her face. Or maybe it’s her mouth. I’m not sure…. she looks really weird, though.
In other news:
via Daily Mail
Basset Hounds with Steve Buscemi eyes running
Yesterday I talked about Steve Buscemi Eyes being photoshopped onto celebrities, and a few weeks back I posted a photo gallery of Basset Hounds running. Someone combined those 2 things into the ultimate internet image gallery. I give you….. Basset Hounds with Steve Buscemi eyes running.
Animals with photoshopped shark mouths. Do not underestimate the awesomeness.
And yes, I agree the human is absolutely terrifying, but it needed to be included, no?
Recent Comments